Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article reassessment for Wilsonville, Oregon

[edit]

Wilsonville, Oregon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Tawau

[edit]

Tawau has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Johor Bahru

[edit]

Johor Bahru has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. hundenvonPG (talk) 21:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:City of Stockholm (city municipality) § Requested move 27 December 2024, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Ham II (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Seoul Capital Area#Requested move 29 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TheInfernoX (talk) 09:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Varanasi

[edit]

Varanasi has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appointed/elected positions in infobox below mayor

[edit]

I've bumped into a number of articles where custom fields are being used in {{Infobox settlement}} to describe positions other than "mayor" (or the equivalent), such as clerk or administrator. Has this been discussed before? What are people's thoughts about this? --Hammersoft (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's been discussed before, but my take is that it is a bad idea and will soon result in unmaintained out-of-date information. Such positions are rarely notable. There perhaps is some justification in larger municipalities that might have some non-standard offices of significance. The articles for larger municipalities will have more eyes on them and are thus more likely to get timely updates after a change and less likely to have random vanity additions stand for very long. olderwiser 16:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of towns and villages depopulated during the 1947–1949 Palestine war#Requested move 15 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lethbridge at FAR

[edit]

I have nominated Lethbridge for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 04:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Moncton

[edit]

Moncton has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has requested that Trebizond be moved to Trebizond (disambiguation), which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. TiggerJay(talk) 05:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Washington, D.C.

[edit]

I have nominated Washington, D.C. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 01:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]